Role of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated first-line with abiraterone. / Papel del índice neutrófilo/linfocito en pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a castración metastásicos tratados en primera línea con abiraterona.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with prostate cancer, high NLR seems to be associated with worse survival. Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a new generation hormonal treatment that has shown to increase PFS and OS in mCRPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with AA in our center (December 2012-September 2018). We analyzed the association of the NLR (< or ≥ 3) before and after 6 months of treatment with PSA response, PFS, OS, and hormone sensitivity prior to AA (< or> 12 months). RESULTS: We have treated 56 patients with a median age of 82 (62-94), of which 22 (39%) had NLR ≥ 3 before treatment. There is a statistically significant association between the NLR prior to treatment<3 and PSA response, OR=9,444, P=.001, and there was no association with the NLR at 6 months of treatment. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups of NLR 3 prior to treatment with abiraterone in PFS with 15 months of median vs. 9 and P=.008, and in OS with 20 months vs. 9 with P=.014. With respect to the determination of NLR at 6 months, there are no differences in the survival curves between both groups. There are significant differences between the NLR prior to treatment according to the length of hormone sensitivity (P=.026). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NLR could provide relevant information and could act as an early and accessible prognostic marker in patients with mCRPC in first line treatment with Abiraterone.

Graft Survival in Patients Who Received Second Allograft, Comparing Those With or Without Previous Failed Allograft Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, the number of patients receiving a second graft is growing, and the management of failed grafts is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the influence of graft nephrectomy on graft and patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the demographic features and graft outcomes of 63 recipients who received second allografts between August 1985 and April 2013. They were divided into two groups: group A, those who underwent nephrectomy of failed graft (n = 21, 33.3%), and group B, those whose failed graft was retained (n = 42, 66.6%). χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare demographic characteristics and graft features in both groups. Kaplan-Meier test was used to analyze graft and patient survival. Finally, univariate and multivariate analysis was done using Cox regression. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of donor and receptors were similar in both groups. Overall panel-reactive antibody (P = .040) showed statistically significant differences between groups (72.0 ± 25.3 in group A and 54.8 ± 30.0 in group B). Hemodialysis duration was longer in group A (P = .023, 112.2 ± 72.8 vs 70.9 ± 66.9 months). The percentage of patients who had delayed graft function was higher in group A (58.8% vs 27.3%, P = .029). Kaplan-Meier test found no differences between groups (P = .344); group A, 107.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.0 to 140.8) and group B, 82.7 months (95% CI 62.5 to 102.8). We found no differences in terms of patient survival (P = .798) with the Kaplan-Meier test. In group A, patient survival was 164.5 months (CI 137.7 to 191.31) and in group B, 152.0 months (95% CI 125.5 to 178.5). CONCLUSIONS: Failed graft nephrectomy did not show a negative impact on graft and patient survival.

Influence of Donor and Recipient Ages in Survival of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a well treatment for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Donor age is a barrier to the acceptance of organs. Age matching has been extensively studied in kidney transplantation; however, there are no studies in graft survival after SPKT. We aimed to study the combined influence of the ages of the donors and recipients in graft survival after SPKT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donors and recipients are classified as younger (age <40 years) or older (age ≥40 years). There were four study groups (young-young, young-old, old-young, and old-old). They were evaluated retrospectively for demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients and the long-term survival between 2001 and 2012 of kidney pancreas transplantation patients at our center. RESULTS: A total of 115 transplantations were performed. The four groups had 55 young-young, 40 young-old, 10 old-young, and 10 old-old patients. Serious complications occurred in 32%, 42%, 30%, and 40%, respectively, and deaths were 2%, 5%, 0%, and 20%, respectively, in the groups. Pancreas graft survival at 3 years for each group was 80%, 87, 5%, 90%, and 60%, respectively, and kidney graft survival was 92.7%, 90%, 90%, and 70%, respectively. Panel-reactive antibodies (PRAs) >30% were associated with poor graft survival, and serious postoperative complications associated with poor pancreas-kidney graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, both younger and older recipients show excellent long-term graft and patient survival after SPKTs from younger donors. We recommended that older-recipient SPKT be transplanted from younger donors because older recipients who have been transplanted from older donors had decreased survival.

Validation of the Pancreatic Donor Risk Index in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Performed in Córdoba Hospital From 2000 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: The Pancreatic Donor Risk Index (PDRI) was developed in 2010 in the United States to predict graft survival after pancreas transplantation, based on donor characteristics and logistical and technical conditions. The aim of the study was to validate the utility of PDRI as a pancreas allograft survival predictor in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) transplants performed in our hospital between 2000 and 2015. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 126 SPK transplants was performed by the same surgical team from the years 2000 to 2015. Donor variables that are integrated in the PDRI were calculated (age, sex, race, creatinine serum levels, body mass index, height, cold ischemia time, cause of death, type of pancreas transplant). Pancreatic graft survival at 1 and 5 years was calculated by use of the Kaplan-Meier test. Comparison of survival curves between PDRI risk quartiles was calculated by use of the log-rank test. Association between graft survival and variables integrating the PDRI was calculated by use of univariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Log-rank analysis found no statistically significant association between global graft survival and PDRI quartiles. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between graft survival and cold ischemia time (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: PDRI was not a useful tool to predict pancreatic graft outcomes in a Spanish reference population.